I pitted three 4k-capable consumer 360 cameras against each other to see which has the best video quality:
the Samsung Gear 360 ($350),
the Nikon Keymission ($499), and
the Kodak SP360 4k Dual Pro ($899).
I also added the Insta360 Nano ($199), which has near-4k resolution at 3040 x 1520 to the comparison. Check out the test videos to see which one emerged as the winner!
(Note: I had also compared the video quality from the Ricoh Theta S ($349) and LG 360 Cam ($199) previously. If you want to see how those cameras compare to these 4k cameras, see here.)
360 videos require very high resolution because the user is only looking at a crop of the video at any given time. For fully spherical 360 consumer cameras, the highest available resolution is 4k (generally 3840 x 1920 or 4096 x 2048 for 360 videos).
Three of the most popular 4k-capable spherical 360 cameras are the Kodak SP360 4k Dual Pro, Samsung Gear 360, and Nikon Keymission 360. Another is the Insta360 4k which has 4096 x 2048 resolution @ 25 fps, but I don’t have one to test. I did however include its little brother, the Insta360 Nano, which has a resolution slightly less than 4k (3040 x 1520). There is another spherical 360 camera for consumers with 4k resolution — the Allie Home — but the framerate is limited to 15 fps.
The Kodak SP360 4k Dual Pro ($899) was the first spherical consumer 360 camera to be capable of 4k resolution. Technically, it is actually a rig, not a camera, because it consists of two SP360 4k cameras back to back, whose output must be stitched by the user. This adds to complexity but also makes it possible to use it in ways that other all-in-one 360 cameras can’t, such as 180-degree 3D capture, or fully spherical aerial 360 videos without the drone in the shot.
The Nikon Keymission 360 ($499) is currently the newest spherical 360 camera with 4k resolution. It is thus far the only spherical 360 camera that is both shockproof (to 2m) and waterproof (to 30m) without the need for an external housing.
The Samsung Gear 360 ($350) is the most affordable 4k-capable 360 camera. However, it only connects with the latest flagship Samsung phones (Galaxy S6 and above).
The Insta360 Nano ($199) has a slightly lower resolution than the other cameras in this group, but it is far more affordable than any of the other cameras here. However, the Nano works only with the iPhone 6 series or iPhone 7.
VIDEO QUALITY COMPARISON
Here is a playlist with videos from all the cameras, including a sharpened and a non-sharpened version for the SP360 4k,
Here are crops from each video showing performance at the middle of the lens (where lenses tend to perform better), both at near and far distances, and at the side of the lens (which usually are more blurred), also both near and far. Please double-click to see larger versions.
Middle of lens – far: even at far distances, the Nano maintains pretty good detail. You can somewhat make out the horizontal lines on the shed near the slide.
Side of the lens – near: the Nano still looks ok at the periphery of the lens at close distances. As for the stitching, the camera does as well as can be expected given that its lenses are offset and thus at different distances.
Side of the lens – far: the area near the stitch line looks blurred.
You can see some chromatic aberration and purple fringing:
Samsung Gear 360:
Middle of lens – far: beyond a moderate distance (farther than the soccer goal), the Gear 360 doesn’t capture much detail. You can’t see the texture of the grass at that distance, much less the lines on the shed.
Side of lens – near: stitching looks natural.
Side of lens – far: while there is less detail than the middle of the lens, the Gear 360’s sharpness from the side is better than either the Insta360 Nano or the Keymission 360. In addition, the stitching still looks natural. It is the only camera in this group that was able to get a smooth stitch for both a near object (the wall) and a far object (the side of the house).
Looking directly overhead, you can see one of the Gear 360’s issues which is that sometimes there is a difference in color between the two lenses (the left side looks purplish while the sky on the right side looks cyan). On the other hand, there is no chromatic aberration.
Nikon Keymission 360:
Note: for the Keymission 360, I turned on Active D-Lighting, which underexposes slightly to capture more highlight detail and digitally boosts exposure to compensate for the underexposure.
Middle of lens – near: the Keymission looks detailed in the middle of the lens.
Middle of the lens – far: the Keymission has the most detail, edging out the SP360 4k slightly (see below).
Side of the lens – near: decent level of detail, natural looking stitch.
Side of the lens – far: whereas the middle of the lens had class-leading detail, the side of the lens only has noticeably less detail. It appears that Nikon intentionally blurred the stitch line to make the stitch less obvious but at the cost of sacrificing detail.
Directly overhead, we can see the Keymission 360 was able to retain more highlight than the other cameras. We can also see some slight chromatic aberration.
Kodak SP360 4k without sharpening:
Middle of the lens – near: not surprisingly, the SP360 4k looks detailed.
Middle of the lens – far: even for farther objects, the SP360 4k looks detailed. It is only very slightly edged out by the Keymission 360 for detail at the middle of the lens.
Side of the lens – near: still very detailed. The stitching isn’t great. The SP360 has the largest distance between its lenses compared to the other cameras in this comparison. With the largest distance, it has the greatest parallax discrepancy, and when stitching you have to choose whether to stitch for near objects or far objects. In this case, I chose to prioritize the stitching for the side of the house, which meant sacrificing the stitching for the wall.
Side of the lens – far: the SP360 captures more detail at the side of the lens than any of the other cameras in this comparison.
Looking directly overhead, we can see the SP360 shows no chromatic aberration.
Kodak SP360 4k with sharpening
Kodak’s stitching software allows you to adjust the appearance of photos and videos, including sharpness. Here is the same SP360 video but with sharpness increased using the SP360’s software, which makes the SP360 video look noticeably sharper.
Because of the SP360’s excellent detail at the middle of its lens and its best-in-class detail at the side of the lens, and because it does not have significant optical issues, I conclude that the SP360 has the best overall video quality in this comparison. However, even the SP360 is not perfect. For example, stitching is harder than the other 360 cameras in this group due to parallax. In addition, in some cases, its two cameras capture different colors and/or exposure.
+ best value
+ best 360 livestreaming capability
+ best app
+ best portability
– app requires an iPhone 6 series or 7 series
– prone to chromatic aberration and purple fringing near stitch line
+ best stitching for this group
+ tied with SP360 for best consistency of sharpness across the frame
+ best on-camera controls/menus
+ best video quality under $500
+ the best action-readiness (shockproof and waterproof)
+ best dynamic range (with Active D-Lighting)
+ easiest/most convenient workflow
– area near stitch line is blurry
+ highest overall video quality among consumer 360 cameras
+ tied with Gear 360 for best consistency of sharpness across the frame
– stitching is usually a compromise because of large distance between lenses
– need to manage two memory cards and two batteries (higher possibility of errors/failure)
– may have difference in exposure and/or color between the two cameras.
If you found this comparison helpful and would like to buy one of these 360 cameras, I would highly appreciate it if you could consider purchasing through our Amazon affiliate links below, which would support 360 Rumors at no cost to you so I can do more reviews and tests of these and other 360 cameras and accessories! Thank you very much!